Photo from The Mountaineer

#UDLChat 3/18/2020

Table of Contents

S.M.A.R.T. Assessment Method.
S.M.A.R.T. Assessment Method. Feedback and Goals that are Specific, Measurable, Action Oriented, Realistic, and Time Bound.

Reflection

This Twitter chat session was undoubtedly challenging. The topic was “Assessment For All Learners/Going Grade-less.” Assigning letter grades and percentages is so engrained into our traditional education system. The key I found through the discussion is that assessment, and not grading, is the approach to strive toward to improve learning. While it was in the title of the topic, many see assessment as a grade and percent because it can provide “tangible” and measurable data that can lead to some form of qualitative opinion. What I have seen in learning about UDL is that rubrics, if appropriately formulated, can both provide a benchmark for quantitative information and be created to assess the goal and not the submission format. In other words, one rubric can assess knowledge and understanding gained from an assignment if it is a paper, in-person presentation, video recording, audio recording, graphic organizer, drawing, or another acceptable format.

Some of these formats may not be familiar to the instructor, though. Technical skills to create video or any of the other creative forms of expression may not be in their particular portfolio and may cause apprehension to allow it. This reason could be due to them not being able to support the learner if they have issues creating their artifact. It could also be that they did not know such a technology existed. Whatever the reason, having knowledgeable technical support available to the instructor would allow potential training opportunities, would be able to assist the learner with their goal and ensure the proper technology is available to support. Positive collaboration between educators and technical staff is vital to expanding options for the institution and all stakeholders. Educators must also be aware of request procedures to adopt the technology. There are accessibility, privacy, data ownership and transfer-ability, retention for grading documentation, licensing, intellectual property, legal, existing tools that are already licensed and available, and other dimensions to consider. While doing a try out of a free or trial account for new educational technology is how we see new creative ways of expression, adopting it without working with technical staff and going through the procurement process can have serious ramifications.

Besides the possible technology barrier, other low or no technology options are available to assess learner progress. Encouragement, promoting goal setting, and requiring student reflection on their development are all effective ways of assessing learners.

Responses

Assessment For All Learners/Going Grade-less

Q1: Why do we grade students?

Q2: Could the implementation of UDL support the elimination of grades?

Q3: How can UDL support ways to focus less on grades and more on learning?

Q4: While thinking about the UDL Framework, what are the ways you can better communicate student growth and progress?

Question Source

UDLchat March 18, 2020 Question Source

Twitter Chat Archive

UDLchat March 18, 2020 Twitter Chat Archive (Wakelet)

UDLchat March 18, 2020 (PDF)

Steven Kolberg
Steven Kolberg
Senior Coordinator of Accessibility and LMS Administration

My research interests include instructional design, web accessibility, computer programming, and education.

Related